on the (im)material conditions for ‘birth’

still inhaling that opiate for the masses i see. technology? media? no, we have long seen through such smoke and mirrors. the anonymizing affect of the marketplace where you feel your labor-value, your being, denigrated in comparison to the ‘gold’ standard. but what is this standard? this absolute that determines identity, the law of A=A, that inscribes upon stone tablets the myth of the 1:1 exchange? that technologically erected archi-tecture by the spirit of onto-theology.. that seeds the spirit of capitalism? against which the value of your labor, your seed pro-duct, your being regresses into oblivion? ‘gold’ standard? indeed, the streets of heaven are paved with it. yet the promise of progeny, of investment-gain is not so assured anymore. man’s will to self-promulgation stalled by, imprisoned within, a specular hall of infinite self-representations…within language, standard of the logos…ideological gold. oh ye of no faith…the man of values! the man of self-subsistence that subsists off of the marginalization, the labor of Others! to pave streets of gold. this man of ‘God’, of ‘Go(l)d’, the man of rationale and science, of self-deception and malaise! he who erects archi- (the causa sui!), indeed phalli-tectures to invest his seed capital into, dissemination of his pro-duct over the earth…covering, concealing Nature. self-expulsion, intentional razing of that primordial garden. dividing the labor- you, pull the weeds; you, fertilize; you, procure fruit; you, excavate…and so salvation history is written via the division of labor, via the splintered self, the economized garden…the spirit of phallogocentrism, the spirit of onto-theology! of deferred responsibility. all from what, the burden of the midday sun? indeed, these men of ‘God’ are no laborers. they know nothing of play. but of course we are not speaking of marketplaces nor capitalism, we are speaking of the science of ‘God’, the metaphysics par excellence- theology! the Spirit of phallo-capitalism that erects its storehouse, its house where it is to be stored, where its capital aggregates…or obliviates- the church! a storehouse! a marketplace par excellence..of self-idealism that posits, that births via the economic caesarean (by imperial mandate!), via the rape of science over Her body that pro-creates, that builds, that erects babel 2.0: the God of onto-theology.

ok, so in less aphoristic language…we are all lazy idiots. the positing of an antipodal distance between work and play creates the master-slave paradigm, it creates morality. religion. a market. when we cease to be responsible for our own means of subsistence, we require a labor force, we rely on a marketplace to procure resources. we become reliant on superstructures. we of the first-world problems. we invest, divest, our ousia, our inheritance, our being into an ideal that was posited, to do the work we dont want to do, for us. instead what happens is we are subjected to the demands that we created and are forced to work all the more, further entrenching our already faulty self-referential psychology in the idealisms of oppositions…of morality that posits good and evil, work and play. but of course this isn’t strictly about capitalism. this is about the affair between christianity and reason that aborts faith. christianity exists at the expense of faith. but i’m in no mood to spoon feed today.

if one were to pull a thoreau and do a walden, one would not require the marketplace.
but the existence of the market ideal sustains law and order.
would not the dissolution of the marketplace result in anarchy? the dissolution of the social contract?
for what is such a contract other than that made for the marketplace?
where fair exchange can be agreed upon in a civil, moral (value-driven) way.
the cost of providing for one’s self one’s own material subsistence…is the forfeit of protection,
and the embrace of possession. of self-representation.
see how intractable of a problem this is?
we are so used to such phallic orders that to think their contrary, to think [nothingness] seems futile..
seems mad. seems sadomasochistic. yet it is here that faith begins.

related posts:
the birth of ‘God’
aborted margins
madness? this is sparta!

no comments

to boldly go…

from the 2009 star trek

 James T. Kirk: [to Spock] The test itself is a cheat, isn’t it? I mean, you programmed it to be unwinnable.

Spock: Your argument precludes the possibility of a no-win scenario.

James T. Kirk: I don’t believe in no-win scenarios.

Spock: Then not only did you violate the rules, you also failed to understand the principal lesson.

James T. Kirk: Please enlighten me.

Spock: You of all people should know, Cadet Kirk, a captain cannot cheat death.

James T. Kirk: [reminiscing] I of all people…

Spock: Your father, Lieutenant George Kirk, assumed command of his vessel before being killed in action, did he not?

James T. Kirk: I don’t think you like the fact that I beat your test.

Spock: Furthermore, you have failed to divine the purpose of the test.

James T. Kirk: Enlighten me again.

Spock: The purpose is to experience fear, fear in the face of certain death, to accept that fear, and maintain control of oneself and one’s crew. This is the quality expected in every Starfleet captain.

the test. the test that is itself a cheat. a no-win situation. the test that is itself a cheat, is itself an unresolvable aporia..is it not life? the to-be? the unbeatable copula? to be trapped in a self-referential existence? trapped between the ‘i’ and ‘s’ of ‘is’? is the cheat not the cheat of the metaphysical…the cheat of the ground of Being, the cheat of…the ‘God’/Self that cannot be overcome? for to-be is to posit ‘God’, a causa sui? existence- the cheat. the ruse. the lie. the representation of ‘life’.

the test is over when you die. there is no winning. there is only survival. striving with the tension. death. hence the second cheat. the cheat of death that cheats the cheat of life. to overcome life one must embrace death. alterity. responsibility. this is the quality expected in every…person of faith. or madness. the person of difference. the slayer of ‘God’.

but of course there is no test. there is no existence.. without an Other that differentiates the Self from itself and births it into being. there is no Kirk without Spock. there is no identity, there is no me without the test of you. without the Other the Self could not ever know itself in its death and re-birth, in its madness… faith cannot be without difference.

wake up people. no matter how spock we are to kirks or how kirk we are to spocks. we need each other.

after all, is not every journey, every voyage, every adventure…a revelation into the dialectic of Self/Other? what are these films about other than…[love]?

“[Nothingness]: the final frontier. These are the voyages of the [person of Faith]. Her ongoing mission: to explore [unknown] new worlds, to seek out [neglected] life-forms and [marginalized] civilizations; to boldly go where no one has gone before.”

to boldly go. to boldly die. where no one has gone before. the other side of death. the next moment. the present moment. the infinite.

no comments

Protected: oppression and justice: volf’s rhetoric of violence

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

q u e u e